Category Archives: Technology

“Breakfasts here suck”

Fascinated by the fact that San Quentin State Prison is on Yelp.

Though it looks like this started out as a snarky joke, I’m loving the re-appropriation of the space for conversation about prison conditions and tourist mentality. In some ways I think having students look at review sites like Yelp as sites of civic participation offers tremendous potential. I think students accessing and engaging in conversations through these venues offer the kind of imagination that’s lacking in much of today’s youth-organizing and public participation methods.

Somewhat reminds me of what’s happening with book reviews for The Possessed. The debate around the Macmillan vs. Kindle situation is clouding authentic book review. (Full disclosure, I found this site from reading the author’s blog. This guest post, in particular, is fantastic.)

Only tangentially related, I’ve been feeling skeptical about crowd sourcing and grant funding. I’m excited about the Refresh Everything project, but feel it’s going to mainly help those that need help less than those that can’t directly connect and leverage mass online participation (like, say, public school teachers and students in South Central Los Angeles). I’m still wrapping my head around this but when my Twitter and Facebook feeds are full of advocates to vote for TFA and other well-established programs, I can’t help but wonder what other voices are being left out. More to come on this topic – there is, after all, a whole year for this program.

On Focusing on “Learning” At the Digital Media and Learning Conference

Overall, I can say I was both impressed and pleased with the way the Digital Media and Learning Conference went. It was certainly one of the more exciting conferences I’ve dragged myself to in the past few years. I think the interdisciplinary nature of DML made for much richer conversations than the kinds I find myself falling into at ed conferences.

I’ve left with a huge list of people to stay connected with and a ton of areas for collaboration with my students and colleagues at Manual Arts. In particular, many of the programs taking place at USC are right up the alley of the work I see our 9th grade academy tackling come July. Would love to build a more extensive relationship with USC that extends beyond the generally small (and non-b-track) opportunities of the NAI program.

I left with three general critiques to keep in mind for next year’s conference:

  1. For a conference focused around “Learning,” there was a dearth of actual practitioners. In addition to my presentation, I know my colleague Veronica Garcia did an amazing job presenting with her students. But how many other teachers presented, let alone even attended? This is a general critique I have of other conferences too – AERA especially. How are we expecting teachers to hear about these conferences and opportunities? What are we saying about the role of schools in digital practices if they aren’t a part of these conversations? And if the bulk of a conference is during “school days” are we making it that accessible to teachers when funding for substitutes is tight?
  2. Some of the panels were positively bursting with too many people. The Saturday evening symposium especially had too robust a group with far too much important information to share to be adequately covered in the short time. I admire the effort here, but would have preferred if each person was given a larger slot of time and used the Saturday session to really see dialogue across the various interdisciplinary perspectives.
  3. Like my first critique, the bulk of the presentations I went to and the two keynotes focused on the informal practices of youth and what happens outside of schools. I get that this is where most of these practices are happening. I’ve written elsewhere about how schools stifle these kinds of digital practices. However, why aren’t we demanding and discussing the empirical research about what is and should be within a school? Where is the ongoing conversation about what needs to happen in schools? I think this, in particular, would have been aided by the presence of more teachers. Instead, I think I came across as the whiny, complaining teacher on the DML twitter feed (speaking of which, I’m going to unabashedly wave my n00b flag and say that this conference and the #dml2010 hashtag really helped me get twitter – the conversations and dialogue there were a great experiential area of development for me).

Again, I need to emphasize that this was a really great conference. I’m excited about being connected next year. I hope that there will be more of my colleagues in the room next time (and keeping it free will be key for getting classroom teachers to be willing to venture out with the budget crisis nowhere near an adequate conclusion).

Conference Season – Digital Media and Learning

I’m in the process of slowly weaving various conferences into my teaching/studying/dog-walking schedule.

This Friday I’ll be participating in the Digital Media and Learning Conference in San Diego. I’m speaking as part of a session titled “Orality, Pedagogy, and New Media: How Children Develop Self-Awareness and Collective Consciousness.” I’m pasting the info below. Registration is closed, but if you’re heading down there anyways, drop me a line.

Orality, Pedagogy, and New Media: How Children Develop Self-Awareness and Collective Consciousness

Location: Room 4004

Chair: Antero Garcia (University of California, Los Angeles)

Participants: Antero Garcia (University of California, Los Angeles), Greg Niemeyer (University of California, Berkeley), Davida Herzl (Aclima), Dehanza Rogers (Cal State Northridge), Scott Ruston (Arizona State University, Hugh Downs School of Human Communication)

An analysis of the convergence of orality, pedagogy, and new media, this session looks at how new technologies are still rooted in oral culture and the implications of this distinction on pedagogy. Presenters will discuss and provide interactive opportunities around ways these themes tie into game play, literacy development, data aggregation, and DIY filmmaking. Alternate reality environmental game, the Black Cloud, will anchor part of this presentation and allow real-time prediction and aggregation opportunities for participants. Similarly, session participants will engage in cell-phone literacy demonstrations, help author a FlipCam documentary, and engage in traditional dialogue. Further, presenters will examine the role of radical transparency and collective eco-intelligence as they disrupt existing measuring systems. As social media proliferates and cell phones continue to overcome barriers within classrooms and informal learning environments, the role of orality within education continues to be disregarded. Reexamining new media’s emphasis of an oral culture through text messages, status updates, and twitter feeds, this interactive symposium provides analysis of orality as it plays out in gaming, cell phone applications in a high school context, data aggregation, and the role of documentary filmmaking. Looking into the connections between John Dewey and Walter Ong, this symposium and its interactive dialogue help guide practitioners and researchers towards expanded media and pedagogical opportunities through orality.

Further down the road, I’ll also be presenting with a group of friends at the Critical Teaching in Action Conference on March 13. The full program is not online yet.

The AERA schedule is up too, but I’m still figuring a few things out.

Because It’s More Fun When We Do It: Why We’re Going Viral in 2010

I’ve been thinking about the viral videos that stuck with me over the year. They’ve become less of surprised hamsters and klutzy candid camera mishaps and adorable kittens doing crazy things. Instead, the videos I typically find myself drawn into are the videos of pastiche, remix, and co-authorship.*

Underground MC, Nyle, for instance took an already catchy Kanye produced hook and built it into something arguably better than the original.

Likewise, as much as “I’ve Gotta Feeling” was the inescapable single for much of the year, a bunch of Canadian students somehow made it more personal and exuberant than its overuse in sporting events and capitalist merchandising ever could have.

Why do these things matter? First of all, both are the kinds of videos that – with a bit of creative ingenuity – would be easy for students to create in the classroom. They’re the way students should be interacting with their media at this point. Researchers keep pointing to the way authorship is changing and the fact that students are producers of media. This isn’t something new. However, at least in the context of an urban secondary school, such work of young producers isn’t exactly being encouraged. Think of the empowering potential of having student work go “viral.”

Earlier this year, it felt like a thrill to facilitate a couple of professional development seminars at my school in which I go to talk about the academic validity of Soulja Boy’s dance for “Tell ‘Em.” It was silly but illuminating. 2010 seems like the year for our students to remix the cultural artifacts around them and start making them their own.

* Thinking more broadly about teaching the way to share these kinds of materials, I realize a bit of theory is going to need to inform our class work. I’m working my way through the latest collection of Gladwell’s New Yorker articles and felt that this article on copyright and plagiarism is especially useful; it’s also a great gateway into discussions of Creative Commons and Lessig’s work.

Tech XChange

The current issue of XChange, published online by UCLA’s Center X is focused around “Media & Techno Literacies.” There are some tremendous resources up there for current teachers as well as plenty of readings to peruse.

The “Rethinking MySpace” article I wrote a while ago can be found here along with a brief introduction about changes to the social networking landscape since the article’s initial publication.

Likewise, a podcasting unit I implemented called “Voices of Struggle” can be found as part of XChange here. Though I’m happy to work with teachers adapting the unit, I’m mainly linking here to share the audio samples two of my former students created.

Thanks, Jeff Share, for including me in the issue.

More Stories from Google Image Search

Related to the Google image search lesson mentioned in this post, my student today shared an activity he did over his break.

Passing the time during the thanksgiving break, Cristian typed into Google image search “Beverly Hills.” He said he noticed all of the clean streets and smiling white people. Next, he typed into Google image search “South Central Los Angeles.” The contrast is striking: power lines, fast food, gangs, police making arrests.

As a class, we discussed what stories are being told about these communities. What is being left out and why? As we continue to explore the dual cities in Los Angeles, how we’re able to re-mold the story being told will continue to be the charge our class will take up.

Thanks for sharing the lesson, Cristian.

Aggregated Search, Phone Photos and Talkin’ ‘Bout Mobile Media

In the past two days, I’ve received no less than five emails asking me if I’ve seen this article (I have now … thanks to each of you!). Apparently my research interests have been made pretty explicit at this point.

In any case, I was reminded of a couple of impromptu lessons I created that I’d like to share briefly, related to new media and its application within the classroom.

Google Image Search & Assumptions about Success

After a brief writing exercise in which students projected and wrote about their lives ten years in the future, we took to the Internet. As students described the careers they are interested in pursuing – doctor, lawyer, architect, astronomer, engineer, etc. – we typed each word into Google’s image search*. For the most part, the search results didn’t surprise – predominantly white, male faces showed up as the top results. (Try this, if you haven’t already.) As a class, we talked about what the search represented and why it was one that didn’t reflect our class and community demographics. The lesson was a place to continue our application of fancy words like “hegemony” and “counter-narrative” and to think about how this image search could be changed in the future.

I haven’t written this out yet, but I think a next step for us will be to simulate an aggregate search within the classroom on post-it notes. I need to tweak this, but perhaps it will be similar to an analog game like Go Fish or even Pictionary. I think if we can replicate a model where the faces of success look like the ones in our classroom, we can think more critically about applying the experience to the larger world.

* A student – based on his own “experiments” – warned me not to image search “nurse.” I appreciated his candor, but think that – in the future – that search will be ripe for discussion about gender stereotypes and sexual objectification.

Photographing an Argument

The next assignment was just as simple. Students needed to email or text me a photo they took somewhere in their neighborhood. They would then use the photo to construct an essay-length argument about their community. By the following week, students shared their photos in small groups and then hosted a class-wide curated slide show. (My students took all of the photos in this post in and around our school.)

Again, the assignment itself isn’t novel. However, I found it impressive how – other than a few students that didn’t adhere to the deadline and subsequently borrowed my classroom camera to snap shots around the school – the majority of the students were able to quickly text or email me their photos on time. That our school’s wireless network is faulty or not open to student access, that many students don’t own computers, and the many other concerns that educators have with technology didn’t stand in the way of students taking carefully constructed photos and getting them to me in a way that could be easily shared and projected. Further, if you haven’t been snapping photos on your phone lately, you’d be impressed with the quality. And hearing students discuss the angles, lighting, color, and compositional features of their pictures was also promising. Did mobile media revolutionize my curriculum? No. It did, however, validate the skills and abilities my students had and helped bridge them toward standards-aligned instruction.

A Few Summative Thoughts

Going back to the article that kick started this post, I guess my larger concern with mobile media isn’t if students are cheating or abusing their phone privileges. Instead, I’m interested in student positioning and understanding of the mobile device and of themselves as authors and creators. As we inevitably move toward the eventual acceptance of phones in the classroom, it will be useful for us to construct a foundation on which students can think responsibly about media and their role in consuming and creating it. This may sound like I’m either spewing abstract hogwash or stating the obvious to some, depending on where you stand on the tech debate. I’ll be piloting this theoretical foundation within my classroom later this year, with activities and texts ranging from cell phone ”Freeze Tag” (for lack of a better name) to diving into the words of Bruno Latour. Of course suggestions are always considered and appreciated.

No, Wikipedia, Your Bad

In a not so searing rant to a friend, I wanted to discuss the (likely Clueless-derived) etymology of the phrase “my bad.” Turns out there is no entry for it on Wikipedia – one of the few I’ve come across. Anyone know if “my bad” predates Clueless? Anyone want to help write the entry?

Related, I am struck by how non-existing Wikipedia entries are like the new Googlewhack. The last query I can recall turning up empty handed was about the fictitious show “It’s A Wise Child” that featured the Glass family – though, happily, it looks like this has been rectified.

I Wonder

Will old Kindles also have a distinguishing odor that suggests research, history, familiarity?*

*Likewise, one of the best aspects of doing research at the Clark was being able to look at beautifully bound material dating back five hundred years or more and – there, right there – seeing marginalia in scripts that put my handwriting to shame. Seeing people historically dialogue with the same text I was working with suddenly helped place me in a continuing communal dialogue across time. As I jotted notes on my laptop, I knew that, years ago, someone else was also communicating through the English Reformation-era poetry that my research focused on. And will this dialogue within marginalia (more frequently in library books with notes that are either confounding or mind-blowing) end if the Kindle-ers have their way?

Riding the Dissertation Wave

I recently got a Google Wave preview invite (thanks you-know-who). I’m excited about the collaborative options but anxious to be able to actually collaborate with people other than the handful lucky enough to be testing the preview version.

I created my first semi-working wave today the initial text is as follows:

Thinking about technology, open access, and still wanting something to be generally single-authored, I’m wondering if I can use Google Wave to work through my dissertation.

Some initial questions:

Can I put a Creative Commons license on a wave?

Can I make a wave “public” so I can have anyone read it and make suggestions but still be able to moderate it? I think this could be more managable than creating a Wiki, but just as participatory.

Do I need to wait until this is out of “preview” to best connect others?

I’ve got a meager four contacts on Wave at the moment and only two are aware of the research/teaching behind the dissertation stuff I’ll get around to.

For now, I’m going to try to throw a few ideas up here, play around with this and see if anything can come of it.

I’m trying to experiment with ways to post the wave here, though with everything still a “preview,” I can’t ensure things will stay put. In the meantime, I’m curious about thoughts about proceeding with public head-scratching, drafting, defending, and writing of the dissertation. Is this kind of open approach even going to be accepted?