Category Archives: clips

Sharing “Local Labor Management Relationships as a Vehicle to Advance Reform”

 

The U.S. Department of Education has just released Local Labor Management Relationships as a Vehicle to Advance Reform, a collaborative report of twelve case studies highlighting Labor & Management collaboration for student achievement. Along with an incredible cadre of educators, I was privileged to write one of these case studies. Centered around work and ideas shared at a summit that took place in Denver in February, the report’s abstract, as printed on this page, follows. Thank you Jonathan Eckert for an incredible job editing and compiling this work over the past three months.

In February 2011, the U.S. Department of Education (ED)—along with co‐sponsors from the American Association of School Administrators, the American Federation of Teachers, the Council of the Great City Schools, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the National Education Association, and the National School Boards Association—brought together over 150 school districts at a conference called “Advancing Student Achievement Through Labor Management Collaboration.” Twelve districts noteworthy for the partnership of their district, board, and teacher organization facilitated conversations with district leaders and others in attendance at the conference. This paper attempts to capture what these noteworthy local partnerships have accomplished and, more importantly, how they accomplished it. ED commissioned present and former Teaching Ambassador Fellows, teachers selected for one‐year leadership assignments, to conduct this work. The fellows used interviews, document analysis, and digital audio recordings of presentations made by district leaders to learn from the opportunities and challenges, the successes and missteps of these 12 district partnerships. The introduction to the paper, written by Jonathan Eckert, Professor of Education at Wheaton College, synthesizes the patterns in both the work being done by the districts and how they are doing it.

 

DML Central, Interventions, and Charter Selection Problems

I’ve started blogging for DML Central. My first post went up yesterday and you can read it here.

If anything, the material I write for the DML Central blog will extend ideas I’ve been fulminating over here over the past couple of years (if you are at all an occasional peruser of The American Crawl, you won’t be too surprised by the concepts I write over there).

My first post really focuses on the need for DML related pedagogy and innovation to occur within classrooms and formal learning environments. As I think more about this, I would argue that what DML faces is a charter selection problem.

I’ll expand on this in the coming weeks, here, and hope to use this space to act as a scratchboard for ideas for future posts. (I’ll only be blogging monthly or so over at DML, so if you have suggestions for things you’d like voiced or represented, please drop me a line.

Why I Am Still Talking About MySpace in 2011

I’m honored to have an article I wrote a couple of years ago, “Rethinking MySpace,” republished in the newest book by the Rethinking Schools group, Rethinking Popular Culture and Media.

In terms of publications related to teaching practice, Rethinking Schools is basically the only periodical I consistently read, and I want to encourage any teacher to read and support this work. Rethinking Schools is put together by full time teachers who do this out of a commitment to social justice teaching; as much as I am proud to count myself as a contributor to the magazine, I can say with utmost confidence that I’d still be reading, subscribing, and recommending Rethinking Schools’ materials regardless of if I had written for them.

Now, I realize it is 2011 and I’m now in the position of promoting an article about MySpace. Like Friendster, MySpace has pretty much come and gone. [A good read related to the downfall of MySpace can be found here.]

Talking with students recently, several admitted that they still have an account there, but that for the most part they are almost entirely interacting with peers on Facebook. [This is significantly recent shift that I want to explore further in future posts. Less than a year ago, I would talk to students about Facebook and it was still not considered “cool” or accepted by youth. This was pretty much still the norm.]

In any case, regardless of which corporate entity students are adopting for their social networking, participatory media has directly changed the way students communicate, socialize, learn. The practices I describe in “Rethinking MySpace” are far from obsolete and the challenges we educators face are becoming more complex.

Critically, we need to recognize that many people (not just students) are engaging with new media tools without questioning the structures that are in place: How are companies making money off of my decisions in a space like Facebook? How is this money being used? What capitalist ideologies do I reify each time I “like” a friend’s status update, retweet, or respond to a colleague’s request on a network like academia.edu?

The literacy skills we instill in students need to include not only how to interact with the new tools that have emerged over the past few years, but also a recognition to understand the implications of using these tools.

In upcoming posts, I want to expand on ideas I began with in “Rethinking MySpace,” question how social networking practices have transformed my practice, and explore what is happening in larger conversations about privacy and social networking. In the meantime, please support Rethinking Schools (and their sister site Not Waiting For Superman).

Notes and Disclaimer about being a Department of Education Teaching Ambassador

Two weeks ago I was announced as one of the Department of Education’s Teaching Ambassadors. I spent a week in Washington D.C. with an impressive cohort of other Fellows and I can’t be more excited for what I think this national collective can accomplish.

As a Classroom Fellow, I’ll still continue to teach at Manual Arts and I am still in the midst of my graduate work as well. So what does this mean? While the job itself helps bring me closer to policy discussions about education, I’m also interested in delving into ways to represent youth voice in the policy decisions being made on their behalf. The position itself is open ended in that I am actively looking to connect my local networks of educators, researchers, students, and parents with these larger discussions. To this end, I am explicitly asking you to reach out if you want to discuss current education initiatives, provide feedback, or simply ask questions. The big emphasis, right now, is on the Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) – I am happy to help provide more information or guide conversation around the Blueprint if you, your school, or your local group is interested.

I also need to make it clear here, on my various social networks, and in person that anything I am writing here – unless explicitly stated – does not represent the views of the Department of Education. This blog will still maintain the unclear musings I’ve been focused on for the past few years. The Department of Education is not paying me to maintain this blog, rant elsewhere, or make inane comments in faculty meetings. At the same time, I am still going to be critical of national legislation if it doesn’t seem to meet the needs of my students. Again, though I will often represent the Department of Education or present current legislation, I will make it clear when I am representing their views versus when I am not.

I see a tremendous potential for the local urban communities I’ve been working within to extend their voices and agency through this yearlong position. I am really looking for other interested educators to reach out and share ideas on how to utilize the positive resources this position can provide. While I am wary of some of the things the Department of Education is working on, I’d like your help in voicing these concerns, in suggesting alternative pathways, and in proposing new initiatives. Let’s get to work.

AERA Slides, Papers, and Pep Talks (Oh My!)

I’ve embedded my slides for my AERA presentation, “Can You Hear Me Now?: Student Voice in the Battle For Cell Phone Use in a Less Than Receptive School” below. I’ve reused some of these slides for various presentations at this point and I feel ready to retire most of this for something newer on the next go around.

I will make the paper that Rema Reynolds and I have authored for our presentation, “Hip-Hop ‘Hypocrisy’: New Teacher Perceptions of Critical Pedagogy and Student Experiences in ‘Critical’ Classrooms” available here soon.

Also, I wanted to share a couple of pep talks from the Council of Youth Research below. The first is from Manual Arts High School senior, Gaby Dominguez and the second from UCLA Education Professor Ernest Morrell. Enjoy.

Gaby Dominguez Gives A Pep Talk from Antero Garcia on Vimeo.

Ernest Morrell Speaks to the Council of Youth Research from Antero Garcia on Vimeo.

Tech XChange

The current issue of XChange, published online by UCLA’s Center X is focused around “Media & Techno Literacies.” There are some tremendous resources up there for current teachers as well as plenty of readings to peruse.

The “Rethinking MySpace” article I wrote a while ago can be found here along with a brief introduction about changes to the social networking landscape since the article’s initial publication.

Likewise, a podcasting unit I implemented called “Voices of Struggle” can be found as part of XChange here. Though I’m happy to work with teachers adapting the unit, I’m mainly linking here to share the audio samples two of my former students created.

Thanks, Jeff Share, for including me in the issue.

Patterns Towards Da Future

A paper I co-authored (and partially adapted from my work in a course about Dewey and democracy) was presented at the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) Multimedia Conference in Beijing last week.

Though you (or your institution) will need a subscription to download it, the abstract (below) and the list of citations (linked) should give you a fair idea of where we went with this. If you’re interested, the actual paper can be found here.

ABSTRACT

The authors developed and tested a hyper-local air quality sensor network and a fictional game narrative to evaluate the pedagogical potential of Alternate Reality games for high school students in Los Angeles. This study examined how Deweyan concepts of learning can be applied to game play. The authors found that students developed a unique language to discuss real pollution issues within a fictional construct. Engaging in both civic engagement and educational rigor, student learning was situated in a framework of instruction John Dewey outlines as counter to traditional models of schooling. Despite limitations, including some authoritarian and competitive structures implicit in games, students found new reasons to communicate with real-world adults in verbal and written form. Game-based learning inspired substantial qualitative progress and high levels of engagement among students, compared to traditional teaching methods.