Skip to content

Rethinking “A Call For Change”: Examining Sara’s Criticism of Tyler, the Creator

 

Violence? Check. Homophobic lyrics? Check. Potential for social transformation? Check.

Currently making buzz amongst music geeks is this rant from Sara of Tegan and Sara regarding the lack of criticism about Tyler, the Creator’s homophobic, sexist, violent, lyrics.

Two caveats before I move forward:

  1. I’m not an apologist for offensive lyrics. Frankly, much of the violence – specifically towards women – in the album is troubling for me to hear.
  2. When his crew is causing riots and generally rabble-rousing, I kind of doubt Tyler will get an Elton John to come to his rescue.

That being said, I have a hard time in general lambasting the content of most work for being “offensive.” It reeks of elitism to shy away the ideas, language practices, and recurring tropes of one genre or another. Yes, Tyler’s album may be more violent and more homophobic than most, but criticizing this album, is no different that writing off the bulk of mainstream hip-hop. It’s a problematic genre for critical analysis, but the same recurring ideas, concepts, and language is prevalent in other genres and even other mediums if only slightly more subdued. Just yesterday, Daye and I discussed the racist overtones of the noble savage in The Game of Thrones series. Does the fact that it’s a polished work on HBO adapted from a lauded book make it a more excusable exercise in reinforcing oppressive social norms?

About the lack of criticism of Tyler’s music, Sara writes, “I don’t think race or class actually has anything to do with his hateful message but has EVERYTHING to do with why everyone refuses to admonish him for that message.” Again, I think she’s off on this. Tyler is now the scapegoat for a larger lack of attention to the origins of violent lyrics that neither starts nor end with rap. Will I recommend my mother listen to Goblin? Of course not, just as she’s ceased to recommend I listen to Dave Koz.

Tyler is unapologetic about blaming an absentee father for much of his verbal aggression. Adolescent rejection, issues with authority, and witnessed violence in the community all present themselves throughout Tyler’s lyrics. In essence, his is a life lived as an urban youth. It’s a quintessentially American album that Tyler’s released and I can understand how that is something that will make a lot of people uncomfortable. How we move forward with an album like this is what is interesting to me. With each swear word, each image of misogyny, and each hyper-violent threat, Tyler invites us to imagine what steps are necessary to move this democratic experiment a step further towards equity.

Funnily enough, I was thinking about the rise of ODD FUTURE WOLF GANG KILL THEM ALL as another example of a Beautiful Dark Twisted Pedagogy. Within months, the group has gone from  obscurity to the subject of derision for mainstream artists, selling out concerts, and getting profiled and reviewed by the majority of music press. This article not only captures the essence of ODD FUTURE’s approach, but it also provides key points to take away from the music group’s entry into mainstream popularity. Educators, it would be great to think more critically about the group’s approach to the sharing of information and engagement with audience. [Related, the post’s author also published a really useful series of interviews that point toward ways to redefine education.]

 

P.S. Free Earl?

 

EDIT: After 12 hours being up, here’s a summary of  the searches that lead people to this blog:

{ 3 } Comments

  1. Daye Rogers | May 16, 2011 at 6:37 am | Permalink

    Needless to say I’m not a fan of OFWGKT. I’m still trying to figure out the appeal. Lots of thoughts on this Antero and the previous conversation we had about Game of Thrones, but it’ll have to wait until 3rd week of June.

  2. Roy Christopher | May 16, 2011 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Thanks so much for this thoughtful post. I appreciate your looking past the surface of Odd Future’s work and seeing the potential. What the critics say about Tyler et al. can be — and often is — said about the whole of Hip-hop. The truth is that those are the least interesting, least important aspects of the culture and the music. Thanks for seeing past the hype.

    And thanks for linking to my work. I appreciate the attention.

    Peace, respect, and power to you,

    -royc.

  3. Miss Jane | May 24, 2011 at 6:35 am | Permalink

    Taking things to their logical conclusion, here is my review of Hitler.

    “Moral qualms aside, Hitler’s body of work is impressive. He was a great politician, unifying a nation and accomplishing remarkable feats of administration and social engineering that any politician would envy. He continues to cause moral outrage, but there’s no doubt he achieved a great deal in his time in office.

    We know he was a troubled young man and early experiences may have contributed to his ideology, which had a significant impact on a lot of people. Many find his views completely unacceptable, although he also has many supporters. Although unpalatable to many, there is no doubting he was skilled at implementing large-scale projects which remain a study in the art of politics and public persuasion. Any politician will tell you how hard it is to get legislation enacted, it takes a certain kind of individual to elevate themselves to that level and that is something to be admired. Moral qualms aside, of course.”

{ 1 } Trackback

  1. […] days ago, I was involved in a rational debate about Odd Future Wolf Gang Kill Them All with a student that had failed my class last year. He spoke passionately about the group’s […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *